Both are privacy-first and cookie-free. Only EngageTrack connects your traffic sources to actual Stripe revenue — so you know which channels drive paying customers.
Plausible is solid privacy analytics — no cookies, GDPR compliant, honest about what it tracks. But it stops at traffic. EngageTrack was built specifically for the gap Plausible leaves open: which channels drive paying customers, not just visits. You can run both, or replace Plausible — your call.
| Feature | Plausible | EngageTrack |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue attribution | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cookie-free tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliant | ✓ | ✓ |
| EU data storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Consent banner required | ✗ | ✗ |
| Script size | ~1KB | 3KB |
| Setup time | < 10 min | < 10 min |
| Price | From €9/mo | €5/mo |
| Stripe integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Real-time revenue data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Lighthouse score impact | Zero impact | Zero impact |
Plausible tells you how many people visited from each source. EngageTrack tells you how much revenue came from each source. One number is interesting; the other drives decisions.
EngageTrack connects directly to Stripe via webhook. Every payment is attributed to the traffic source that started the session. No custom events, no manual tracking.
EngageTrack is cheaper than Plausible and adds revenue attribution. If you're already paying for privacy analytics, you're paying less for more.
Why you might still choose Plausible
Plausible has a smaller script (< 1KB vs. 3KB), a more polished dashboard UI, and a longer track record. If traffic analytics is all you need and you don't use Stripe, Plausible does the job cleanly.
If you need to know which channels make you money — not just which ones send traffic — EngageTrack is built for that question. The 2KB difference won't show up in your Lighthouse score.
14-day free trial · No credit card · 5-minute setup
Try EngageTrack free€5/mo after trial